Nithya Raman: A Complex Political Journey

Nithya Raman paused during a debate with Mayor Karen Bass in Sherman Oaks. Asked what she needed to improve to become a better politician, Raman responded, “What I know I need to keep working on is that in order to make sure that your ideas aren’t stopped, you have to invite people in before you try and put them forward.” This moment of candid self-reflection came from the Los Angeles City Council member who aspires to be the next mayor.

Raman, a Harvard and MIT graduate, is recognized for her intelligence. She initiated L.A.’s Tenant Anti-Harassment Ordinance in 2021 and modernized the Rent Stabilization Ordinance, reducing allowable rent increases. Despite these achievements, she often receives poor marks in collaboration and alliance-building.

“She is not a natural-born politician. She’s much more attuned to governing than politicking,” said Rick Cole, a former deputy mayor.

Raman’s entry into the June 2 mayoral primary came shortly after endorsing Bass. Her statement revealed her frustration with the city’s direction and the urgency she felt in changing course. Her legislative successes include strong renter protections and creating a homelessness oversight bureau. Yet, despite her electoral successes with support from DSA, she did not engage with their leaders before declaring her candidacy. This approach led to the DSA recommending her to members without an outright endorsement.

Mayoral Candidacy and Political Landscape

None of the 15 council members have endorsed Raman, while other DSA-backed members have supported Bass. Raman has positioned herself as an outsider in the race, acknowledging that the city’s political elite would not back her. Raman has expressed skepticism about Bass’ Inside Safe program for homelessness, preferring a data-driven approach. Her platform includes revitalizing Hollywood jobs, expanding housing, and simplifying developer red tape.

Before her political career, Raman founded a nonprofit tackling homelessness in Silver Lake and worked with the city to track homelessness spending. Her mayoral bid places her in a tight race against Bass and Spencer Pratt, a former reality TV star.

Challenges in Building Political Consensus

Raman’s ability to work with colleagues has been questioned. Former colleagues note her challenges in collaboration and perception of opposition as bullying. Raman’s interactions with community groups often lack the warm demeanor traditionally associated with politicians. Her focus on legal and community responsiveness hasn’t translated into widespread consensus building.

Community leaders and organization heads express varying opinions on her approach, with some appreciating her responsiveness to issues like homelessness and others criticizing her engagement methods.

“A true leader is someone who leads. You need to build consensus and this person has not built any consensus,” said Matt Epstein, president of the Sherman Oaks Homeowners Assn.

Political Positions and Adaptability

Raman’s positions on policing and other major issues have evolved. Initially calling for a reduced LAPD, she has since supported stable officer numbers while opposing budget increases. Her mixed positions have frustrated both left and right, illustrated by police union opposition and accusations of political inconsistency.

Raman’s calls for reforming Measure ULA, the mansion tax, highlighted her concerns about its impact on development. While her approach has stirred dissatisfaction among allies, it’s indicative of her willingness to tackle pressing issues. She has softened her stance on no-camping zones, stating that as mayor, she wouldn’t block council decisions on the matter.

“She really needs to think through things. That’s completely reasonable and responsible,” said Mike Bonin, a progressive former council member.

Raman’s political journey illustrates a figure grappling with the complexities of governance and collaboration in a challenging political landscape.