Survivors Challenge Pentagon’s Account of Iranian Drone Attack

Survivors of a significant Iranian attack on US forces in Kuwait have contested the Pentagon’s narrative, stating their unit was left vulnerable. The attack resulted in six deaths and over 20 injuries. Members of the unit described the event and its aftermath, offering a different perspective than the official Defense Department account.

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth characterized the drone that attacked as a ‘squirter,’ suggesting it penetrated the defenses of a fortified unit. However, one injured service member contradicted this, claiming the unit was unprepared for defense, lacking a fortified position.

The Army’s 103rd Sustainment Command soldier praised their colleagues’ bravery and swift response, emphasizing that despite inadequate security, their actions saved lives. Eye witness accounts, along with photos and videos exclusively obtained, reveal details of the March 1 attack on a Kuwaiti port facility.

Prior to the attack, missile alarms had prompted approximately 60 troops to take cover. When an all-clear was issued, they resumed operations. Yet, the attack left a scene of chaos, with severe injuries and damaged infrastructure, as detailed by eyewitnesses.

Before Operation Epic Fury, many US soldiers in Kuwait were repositioned to Jordan and Saudi Arabia. However, some from the 103rd Sustainment Command remained at a vulnerable Kuwaiti base. The tactical operation center was ill-equipped to handle aerial threats, with only basic barriers providing limited protection.

Concerns existed over the base’s proximity to Iranian attack capabilities. Some soldiers had intelligence indicating the base was a likely target. The lack of adequate drone defense was apparent to those stationed there.

The Pentagon refrained from commenting due to an ongoing investigation. However, Assistant Secretary of Defense Sean Parnell stated that all precautionary measures were implemented to protect troops, mentioning that the facility was fortified with six-foot walls.

The attack demonstrated Iran’s evolving warfare strategy, utilizing drones extensively. Witnesses described chaos and self-triage efforts, including transporting injured comrades to local hospitals. Survivors expressed regret for those still trapped during evacuation but remained proud of their efforts.

Some survivors took issue with Hegseth’s characterization of the incident. They stressed the importance of truth, arguing that understanding mistakes is crucial for future prevention. While acknowledging the risks inherent in combat, one soldier believed the attack was preventable.

Despite the loss, survivors hold pride in their service, honoring their colleagues’ sacrifice and perseverance.

James LaPorta contributed to this report.