Journalists often dedicate considerable attention to country leaders. These leaders set agendas and must be held accountable. However, those who implement these agendas are often overlooked. In autocratic regimes, implementing state tasks can involve activities like intimidation or torture. This raises questions about why individuals would choose such roles, effectively becoming enablers of these regimes.
Amanda Taub provides insights into research that offers unexpected answers to this question.
Argentine security forces in 1982 in Buenos Aires.
Credit. Horacio Villalobos/Corbis, via Getty Images
Autocrats, no matter how powerful, cannot govern in isolation. For instance, Vladimir Putin relies on Russian oligarchs, Iran depends on the Revolutionary Guards, and Viktor Orban constructed Hungary’s “electoral autocracy” with the aid of a selected group of judges, enforcers, and business tycoons.

Judge Overturns Trump-Era Immigration Policies
Trump Aims to Reduce National Intelligence Office Size
California Primary Election 2026: Key Races and Emerging Results
Xavier Becerra Advances in California Governor Race
Trump Criticizes Senator Tillis Amid Nomination Discussions
Clarity Sought on U.S. Troop Levels in Europe Amid Policy Changes